Agent Release Assurance Assessment

• One or two framework integrations
• 25 to 50 scenarios in your domain, run repeatedly
• Tool and system-state correlation at the highest level your telemetry supports
• Signed evidence packs for every run
• A mapping to your internal controls
• Gate statistics and flake classification
• Coverage and evidence-gap analysis
• Findings for executives and findings for engineers, written separately
• A measured comparison against your current manual process

• An existing test agent that takes a real action
• A test environment we can drive, with synthetic users
• Access to the agent's telemetry, such as OpenTelemetry traces
• A named engineering contact, roughly one day a week
• Someone from risk, quality or compliance to review the evidence format
• Your internal control definitions for the journey in scope

If your agents only answer questions, or there is no test environment, this is not for you yet. We will say so on the first call.

• How many agent frameworks are in scope
• How many scenarios and how many languages
• Whether execution has to run inside your tenant
• What telemetry already exists and what has to be instrumented
• Whether we check system state, or only conversation and tool evidence
• The security, data handling and procurement work your organisation requires

• A 30 minute discovery call, then a technical qualification session
• A written scope and fixed quote, usually within a week of qualification
• Six to eight weeks of work
• Payment split between the start and the delivery of findings
• Design partner terms available in exchange for structured feedback and a written decision date, reduced but never free

We tell you the assurance level you can realistically reach before you commit, not after.

Discovery

How agent releases get approved today, what evidence gets assembled by hand, how many frameworks you have, and which action-taking journey is closest to production.

Technical qualification

What assurance level you can actually reach, given your telemetry, your options for checking system state, and your deployment constraints. You get the ceiling before you sign.

Demonstration

The same journey on two frameworks, one evidence format, flawed and corrected versions side by side. Bring whoever has to approve the release.

Assessment

Integration, writing scenarios against your journey, repeated runs, control mapping, evidence packs. Some of the delivery is still manual behind the scenes. The findings are not.

Findings

An executive readout and an engineering readout. What failed, where the evidence gaps are, your measured manual effort baseline, and an honest view on whether to go further.

Expansion, or not

More frameworks, journeys and triggers only once the value has been measured. The assessment stands on its own and is priced accordingly, so it is not a discounted pilot.